ACS Catalysis-期刊论坛，投稿经验-MedSci.cn

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质 经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted 2022.6.20 associated editor assigned 2022.6.22 in peer review 2022.7.14 major revision 2022.8.10 submitted 2022.8.25 minor revision 2022.8.26 submitted 2022.8.31 accepted 编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿 10月28号一个审稿人小修 11月13号返回 到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=70, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=64, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。 修了一个月后返回。 二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。 修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap. 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=147, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=132, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。 publication history received: 19 december 2019 published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2023-09-18 ms2000002053770036 来自辽宁省

审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质
经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted
2022.6.20 associated editor assigned
2022.6.22 in peer review
2022.7.14 major revision
2022.8.10 submitted
2022.8.25 minor revision
2022.8.26 submitted
2022.8.31 accepted
编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利.

34 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质 经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted 2022.6.20 associated editor assigned 2022.6.22 in peer review 2022.7.14 major revision 2022.8.10 submitted 2022.8.25 minor revision 2022.8.26 submitted 2022.8.31 accepted 编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿 10月28号一个审稿人小修 11月13号返回 到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=70, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=64, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。 修了一个月后返回。 二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。 修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap. 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=147, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=132, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。 publication history received: 19 december 2019 published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2016-11-22 ms7260643641707155

几年9月13号投稿
10月28号一个审稿人小修
11月13号返回
到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊

70 2

展开2条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质 经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted 2022.6.20 associated editor assigned 2022.6.22 in peer review 2022.7.14 major revision 2022.8.10 submitted 2022.8.25 minor revision 2022.8.26 submitted 2022.8.31 accepted 编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿 10月28号一个审稿人小修 11月13号返回 到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=70, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=64, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。 修了一个月后返回。 二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。 修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap. 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=147, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=132, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。 publication history received: 19 december 2019 published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2018-04-28 ms6464727228940210

最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了

64 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质 经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted 2022.6.20 associated editor assigned 2022.6.22 in peer review 2022.7.14 major revision 2022.8.10 submitted 2022.8.25 minor revision 2022.8.26 submitted 2022.8.31 accepted 编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿 10月28号一个审稿人小修 11月13号返回 到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=70, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=64, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。 修了一个月后返回。 二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。 修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap. 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=147, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=132, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。 publication history received: 19 december 2019 published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-03-03 ms1582630781068122

审稿速度:3.0
经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。
修了一个月后返回。
二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。
修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap.
整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。

140 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质 经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted 2022.6.20 associated editor assigned 2022.6.22 in peer review 2022.7.14 major revision 2022.8.10 submitted 2022.8.25 minor revision 2022.8.26 submitted 2022.8.31 accepted 编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿 10月28号一个审稿人小修 11月13号返回 到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=70, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=64, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。 修了一个月后返回。 二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。 修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap. 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=147, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=132, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。 publication history received: 19 december 2019 published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-28 ms6000000264964247

是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？

67 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质 经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted 2022.6.20 associated editor assigned 2022.6.22 in peer review 2022.7.14 major revision 2022.8.10 submitted 2022.8.25 minor revision 2022.8.26 submitted 2022.8.31 accepted 编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿 10月28号一个审稿人小修 11月13号返回 到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=70, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=64, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。 修了一个月后返回。 二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。 修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap. 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=147, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=132, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。 publication history received: 19 december 2019 published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-27 衣谷

什么叫实验室常规使用方法？

74 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质 经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted 2022.6.20 associated editor assigned 2022.6.22 in peer review 2022.7.14 major revision 2022.8.10 submitted 2022.8.25 minor revision 2022.8.26 submitted 2022.8.31 accepted 编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿 10月28号一个审稿人小修 11月13号返回 到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=70, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=64, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。 修了一个月后返回。 二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。 修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap. 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=147, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=132, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。 publication history received: 19 december 2019 published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-03-19 ms7657656453231030

审稿速度:2.0
经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？

130 2

展开2条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质 经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted 2022.6.20 associated editor assigned 2022.6.22 in peer review 2022.7.14 major revision 2022.8.10 submitted 2022.8.25 minor revision 2022.8.26 submitted 2022.8.31 accepted 编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿 10月28号一个审稿人小修 11月13号返回 到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=70, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=64, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。 修了一个月后返回。 二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。 修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap. 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=147, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=132, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。 publication history received: 19 december 2019 published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-05-13 ms6336778790072332

审稿速度:2.0
经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。

147 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质 经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted 2022.6.20 associated editor assigned 2022.6.22 in peer review 2022.7.14 major revision 2022.8.10 submitted 2022.8.25 minor revision 2022.8.26 submitted 2022.8.31 accepted 编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿 10月28号一个审稿人小修 11月13号返回 到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=70, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=64, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。 修了一个月后返回。 二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。 修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap. 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=147, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=132, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。 publication history received: 19 december 2019 published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-04-16 ms9686134410729756

审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。

132 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 偏重的研究方向：催化转化;木质纤维生物质 经验分享：2022.6.20 sunmitted 2022.6.20 associated editor assigned 2022.6.22 in peer review 2022.7.14 major revision 2022.8.10 submitted 2022.8.25 minor revision 2022.8.26 submitted 2022.8.31 accepted 编辑效率非常高，审稿人也很严谨负责，祝acs catalysis 越办越好，也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿 10月28号一个审稿人小修 11月13号返回 到今天没有消息快过10天了是不是再送另一个审稿人了呀等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=70, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗？已投稿40天了，依然音信全无，是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=64, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：一审47天，一共四个审稿人，都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格，因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题，所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人，提了很多修改意见。 修了一个月后返回。 二审，又送了两个审稿人，一个直接接收，一个小修，编辑给小修。 修了3天后返回，第二天接收，当天出proof，第三天出asap. 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的，希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：我的第一次2个大修，一个小修，主编chen给了大修，大修返回都一个多月了，还没有任何结果，为何会这么慢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：以前发过这个期刊，当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严，特别是编辑也很严，当时遇到的是olsbye副主编，当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了，数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高，解释也不到位，感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念，但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实，不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=147, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮，可是这两年，图片质量不太上档次了，而且有些工作虽然观点新，可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊，期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=132, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。 publication history received: 19 december 2019 published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-03-06 ms658988217505615

acs catalysis 效率很高，一审20天返回意见，一大修两小修。返修回去，7天后通知接受，个人第一次中这个期刊，祝acs catalysis越来越好。
publication history
received: 19 december 2019
published online: 3 march 2020

127 0

内科

外科

专科科室

热点

按科室浏览

临床工具

科研工具

其他工具

科研数智化

真实世界研究解决方案

数字化学术传播解决方案

其它

期刊讨论

科室

工具

服务