PETROL EXPLOR DEV+ 润色咨询

Petroleum Exploration and Development

出版年份：暂无数据 年文章数：120 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

出版周期：Bimonthly 自引率：32.7% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

前往期刊查询
期刊讨论 | 中国SCI论文 | 期刊主页 | 投稿经验 | 杂志官网 | 投稿链接 | 作者需知 | PMC链接 | Pubmed全文检索

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105585, encodeId=da9311055850c, content=文章类型和选刊有关系吗？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105586, encodeId=ec5d11055868a, content=选刊时选择几个比较合适？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861598, encodeId=973586159861, content=很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。<br> 审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。<br> 中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bff55414034, createdName=ms8780191241558819, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 23:02:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855947, encodeId=3be885594ecb, content=哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=124, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=29385414100, createdName=ms9497043704145630, createdTime=Wed Dec 18 14:11:31 CST 2019, time=2019-12-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855477, encodeId=13cd8554e7d3, content=中国的 老师不让投 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=151, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Mon Dec 02 19:46:43 CST 2019, time=2019-12-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842434, encodeId=edec8424343f, content=一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=139, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Wed Apr 18 21:26:32 CST 2018, time=2018-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840750, encodeId=160d840e5094, content=虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=77f15414044, createdName=ms6596549308483070, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 09:57:27 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=839050, encodeId=2439839050b0, content=审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=143, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Nov 02 16:48:50 CST 2017, time=2017-11-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837145, encodeId=02a783e145c5, content=一轮意见很好，<br> 二轮没有意见被拒。<br> 耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Sat Jun 24 00:41:21 CST 2017, time=2017-06-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836927, encodeId=e10b83692eb8, content=真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。<br> 这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。<br> 学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=78fc5414021, createdName=ms1549354653385798, createdTime=Mon Jun 12 08:49:31 CST 2017, time=2017-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-29 msSSSSSD

    文章类型和选刊有关系吗？

    1

    展开1条回复
  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105585, encodeId=da9311055850c, content=文章类型和选刊有关系吗？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105586, encodeId=ec5d11055868a, content=选刊时选择几个比较合适？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861598, encodeId=973586159861, content=很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。<br> 审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。<br> 中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bff55414034, createdName=ms8780191241558819, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 23:02:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855947, encodeId=3be885594ecb, content=哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=124, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=29385414100, createdName=ms9497043704145630, createdTime=Wed Dec 18 14:11:31 CST 2019, time=2019-12-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855477, encodeId=13cd8554e7d3, content=中国的 老师不让投 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=151, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Mon Dec 02 19:46:43 CST 2019, time=2019-12-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842434, encodeId=edec8424343f, content=一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=139, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Wed Apr 18 21:26:32 CST 2018, time=2018-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840750, encodeId=160d840e5094, content=虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=77f15414044, createdName=ms6596549308483070, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 09:57:27 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=839050, encodeId=2439839050b0, content=审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=143, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Nov 02 16:48:50 CST 2017, time=2017-11-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837145, encodeId=02a783e145c5, content=一轮意见很好，<br> 二轮没有意见被拒。<br> 耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Sat Jun 24 00:41:21 CST 2017, time=2017-06-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836927, encodeId=e10b83692eb8, content=真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。<br> 这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。<br> 学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=78fc5414021, createdName=ms1549354653385798, createdTime=Mon Jun 12 08:49:31 CST 2017, time=2017-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-27 Gym璨烨

    选刊时选择几个比较合适？

    1

    展开1条回复
  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105585, encodeId=da9311055850c, content=文章类型和选刊有关系吗？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105586, encodeId=ec5d11055868a, content=选刊时选择几个比较合适？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861598, encodeId=973586159861, content=很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。<br> 审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。<br> 中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bff55414034, createdName=ms8780191241558819, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 23:02:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855947, encodeId=3be885594ecb, content=哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=124, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=29385414100, createdName=ms9497043704145630, createdTime=Wed Dec 18 14:11:31 CST 2019, time=2019-12-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855477, encodeId=13cd8554e7d3, content=中国的 老师不让投 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=151, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Mon Dec 02 19:46:43 CST 2019, time=2019-12-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842434, encodeId=edec8424343f, content=一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=139, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Wed Apr 18 21:26:32 CST 2018, time=2018-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840750, encodeId=160d840e5094, content=虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=77f15414044, createdName=ms6596549308483070, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 09:57:27 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=839050, encodeId=2439839050b0, content=审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=143, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Nov 02 16:48:50 CST 2017, time=2017-11-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837145, encodeId=02a783e145c5, content=一轮意见很好，<br> 二轮没有意见被拒。<br> 耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Sat Jun 24 00:41:21 CST 2017, time=2017-06-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836927, encodeId=e10b83692eb8, content=真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。<br> 这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。<br> 学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=78fc5414021, createdName=ms1549354653385798, createdTime=Mon Jun 12 08:49:31 CST 2017, time=2017-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-08 ms8780191241558819

    很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。
    审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。
    中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105585, encodeId=da9311055850c, content=文章类型和选刊有关系吗？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105586, encodeId=ec5d11055868a, content=选刊时选择几个比较合适？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861598, encodeId=973586159861, content=很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。<br> 审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。<br> 中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bff55414034, createdName=ms8780191241558819, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 23:02:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855947, encodeId=3be885594ecb, content=哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=124, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=29385414100, createdName=ms9497043704145630, createdTime=Wed Dec 18 14:11:31 CST 2019, time=2019-12-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855477, encodeId=13cd8554e7d3, content=中国的 老师不让投 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=151, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Mon Dec 02 19:46:43 CST 2019, time=2019-12-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842434, encodeId=edec8424343f, content=一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=139, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Wed Apr 18 21:26:32 CST 2018, time=2018-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840750, encodeId=160d840e5094, content=虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=77f15414044, createdName=ms6596549308483070, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 09:57:27 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=839050, encodeId=2439839050b0, content=审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=143, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Nov 02 16:48:50 CST 2017, time=2017-11-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837145, encodeId=02a783e145c5, content=一轮意见很好，<br> 二轮没有意见被拒。<br> 耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Sat Jun 24 00:41:21 CST 2017, time=2017-06-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836927, encodeId=e10b83692eb8, content=真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。<br> 这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。<br> 学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=78fc5414021, createdName=ms1549354653385798, createdTime=Mon Jun 12 08:49:31 CST 2017, time=2017-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-12-18 ms9497043704145630

    哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105585, encodeId=da9311055850c, content=文章类型和选刊有关系吗？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105586, encodeId=ec5d11055868a, content=选刊时选择几个比较合适？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861598, encodeId=973586159861, content=很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。<br> 审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。<br> 中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bff55414034, createdName=ms8780191241558819, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 23:02:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855947, encodeId=3be885594ecb, content=哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=124, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=29385414100, createdName=ms9497043704145630, createdTime=Wed Dec 18 14:11:31 CST 2019, time=2019-12-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855477, encodeId=13cd8554e7d3, content=中国的 老师不让投 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=151, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Mon Dec 02 19:46:43 CST 2019, time=2019-12-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842434, encodeId=edec8424343f, content=一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=139, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Wed Apr 18 21:26:32 CST 2018, time=2018-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840750, encodeId=160d840e5094, content=虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=77f15414044, createdName=ms6596549308483070, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 09:57:27 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=839050, encodeId=2439839050b0, content=审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=143, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Nov 02 16:48:50 CST 2017, time=2017-11-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837145, encodeId=02a783e145c5, content=一轮意见很好，<br> 二轮没有意见被拒。<br> 耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Sat Jun 24 00:41:21 CST 2017, time=2017-06-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836927, encodeId=e10b83692eb8, content=真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。<br> 这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。<br> 学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=78fc5414021, createdName=ms1549354653385798, createdTime=Mon Jun 12 08:49:31 CST 2017, time=2017-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-12-02 ms61234328952836

    中国的 老师不让投

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105585, encodeId=da9311055850c, content=文章类型和选刊有关系吗？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105586, encodeId=ec5d11055868a, content=选刊时选择几个比较合适？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861598, encodeId=973586159861, content=很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。<br> 审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。<br> 中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bff55414034, createdName=ms8780191241558819, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 23:02:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855947, encodeId=3be885594ecb, content=哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=124, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=29385414100, createdName=ms9497043704145630, createdTime=Wed Dec 18 14:11:31 CST 2019, time=2019-12-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855477, encodeId=13cd8554e7d3, content=中国的 老师不让投 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=151, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Mon Dec 02 19:46:43 CST 2019, time=2019-12-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842434, encodeId=edec8424343f, content=一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=139, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Wed Apr 18 21:26:32 CST 2018, time=2018-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840750, encodeId=160d840e5094, content=虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=77f15414044, createdName=ms6596549308483070, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 09:57:27 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=839050, encodeId=2439839050b0, content=审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=143, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Nov 02 16:48:50 CST 2017, time=2017-11-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837145, encodeId=02a783e145c5, content=一轮意见很好，<br> 二轮没有意见被拒。<br> 耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Sat Jun 24 00:41:21 CST 2017, time=2017-06-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836927, encodeId=e10b83692eb8, content=真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。<br> 这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。<br> 学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=78fc5414021, createdName=ms1549354653385798, createdTime=Mon Jun 12 08:49:31 CST 2017, time=2017-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-04-18 ms1688128040813029

    一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105585, encodeId=da9311055850c, content=文章类型和选刊有关系吗？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105586, encodeId=ec5d11055868a, content=选刊时选择几个比较合适？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861598, encodeId=973586159861, content=很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。<br> 审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。<br> 中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bff55414034, createdName=ms8780191241558819, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 23:02:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855947, encodeId=3be885594ecb, content=哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=124, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=29385414100, createdName=ms9497043704145630, createdTime=Wed Dec 18 14:11:31 CST 2019, time=2019-12-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855477, encodeId=13cd8554e7d3, content=中国的 老师不让投 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=151, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Mon Dec 02 19:46:43 CST 2019, time=2019-12-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842434, encodeId=edec8424343f, content=一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=139, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Wed Apr 18 21:26:32 CST 2018, time=2018-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840750, encodeId=160d840e5094, content=虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=77f15414044, createdName=ms6596549308483070, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 09:57:27 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=839050, encodeId=2439839050b0, content=审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=143, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Nov 02 16:48:50 CST 2017, time=2017-11-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837145, encodeId=02a783e145c5, content=一轮意见很好，<br> 二轮没有意见被拒。<br> 耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Sat Jun 24 00:41:21 CST 2017, time=2017-06-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836927, encodeId=e10b83692eb8, content=真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。<br> 这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。<br> 学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=78fc5414021, createdName=ms1549354653385798, createdTime=Mon Jun 12 08:49:31 CST 2017, time=2017-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-01-30 ms6596549308483070

    虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105585, encodeId=da9311055850c, content=文章类型和选刊有关系吗？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105586, encodeId=ec5d11055868a, content=选刊时选择几个比较合适？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861598, encodeId=973586159861, content=很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。<br> 审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。<br> 中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bff55414034, createdName=ms8780191241558819, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 23:02:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855947, encodeId=3be885594ecb, content=哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=124, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=29385414100, createdName=ms9497043704145630, createdTime=Wed Dec 18 14:11:31 CST 2019, time=2019-12-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855477, encodeId=13cd8554e7d3, content=中国的 老师不让投 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=151, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Mon Dec 02 19:46:43 CST 2019, time=2019-12-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842434, encodeId=edec8424343f, content=一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=139, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Wed Apr 18 21:26:32 CST 2018, time=2018-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840750, encodeId=160d840e5094, content=虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=77f15414044, createdName=ms6596549308483070, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 09:57:27 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=839050, encodeId=2439839050b0, content=审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=143, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Nov 02 16:48:50 CST 2017, time=2017-11-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837145, encodeId=02a783e145c5, content=一轮意见很好，<br> 二轮没有意见被拒。<br> 耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Sat Jun 24 00:41:21 CST 2017, time=2017-06-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836927, encodeId=e10b83692eb8, content=真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。<br> 这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。<br> 学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=78fc5414021, createdName=ms1549354653385798, createdTime=Mon Jun 12 08:49:31 CST 2017, time=2017-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2017-11-02 ms6967342940128728

    审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105585, encodeId=da9311055850c, content=文章类型和选刊有关系吗？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105586, encodeId=ec5d11055868a, content=选刊时选择几个比较合适？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861598, encodeId=973586159861, content=很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。<br> 审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。<br> 中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bff55414034, createdName=ms8780191241558819, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 23:02:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855947, encodeId=3be885594ecb, content=哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=124, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=29385414100, createdName=ms9497043704145630, createdTime=Wed Dec 18 14:11:31 CST 2019, time=2019-12-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855477, encodeId=13cd8554e7d3, content=中国的 老师不让投 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=151, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Mon Dec 02 19:46:43 CST 2019, time=2019-12-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842434, encodeId=edec8424343f, content=一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=139, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Wed Apr 18 21:26:32 CST 2018, time=2018-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840750, encodeId=160d840e5094, content=虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=77f15414044, createdName=ms6596549308483070, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 09:57:27 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=839050, encodeId=2439839050b0, content=审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=143, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Nov 02 16:48:50 CST 2017, time=2017-11-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837145, encodeId=02a783e145c5, content=一轮意见很好，<br> 二轮没有意见被拒。<br> 耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Sat Jun 24 00:41:21 CST 2017, time=2017-06-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836927, encodeId=e10b83692eb8, content=真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。<br> 这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。<br> 学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=78fc5414021, createdName=ms1549354653385798, createdTime=Mon Jun 12 08:49:31 CST 2017, time=2017-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2017-06-24 ms1357963030559907

    一轮意见很好，
    二轮没有意见被拒。
    耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105585, encodeId=da9311055850c, content=文章类型和选刊有关系吗？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1105586, encodeId=ec5d11055868a, content=选刊时选择几个比较合适？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861598, encodeId=973586159861, content=很糟心的一次投稿经历，把自认为非常创新的工作投了这期刊，一审五个审稿人近50条意见，只给半个月改。天天加班加点还是申请需要延期半个月。<br> 审稿人每个意见都做了非常详细的回复，建议也都照做了，以为大概率能中。结果一个多月二审后，竟然给了拒稿，关键是完全没有审稿人的二审意见。我们辛苦熬夜按照五个审稿人建议改稿子，光回复审稿人就写了近一万词，结果拒稿连审稿人意见都不给，感觉很不被尊重。<br> 中国要提高国内期刊水平是好事，但是仅仅人为的提高分区，水平就能上去吗？难道不应该首先规范这些国内期刊，不专业不透明水平能上去么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bff55414034, createdName=ms8780191241558819, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 23:02:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855947, encodeId=3be885594ecb, content=哦哦，一区！top期刊！响应“优秀文章发表在国内”的号召 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=124, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=29385414100, createdName=ms9497043704145630, createdTime=Wed Dec 18 14:11:31 CST 2019, time=2019-12-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855477, encodeId=13cd8554e7d3, content=中国的 老师不让投 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=151, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Mon Dec 02 19:46:43 CST 2019, time=2019-12-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842434, encodeId=edec8424343f, content=一审有三位外审专家意见，意见挺好，需要改动的少，已经修改后返给编辑部了，进入复审阶段，看到你们的评论，我感觉玄乎，复审显示是2周时间，不知道能不能被收录 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=139, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Wed Apr 18 21:26:32 CST 2018, time=2018-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840750, encodeId=160d840e5094, content=虽然最终被录用，但觉得这是个有些变态期刊，我感觉就是咱们给惯的，国内的这些期刊。再慢的期刊也不至于一年才给结果吧，幸好一年后还没给我拒了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=77f15414044, createdName=ms6596549308483070, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 09:57:27 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=839050, encodeId=2439839050b0, content=审稿后连意见都没给就拒了，是个挺抽风的期刊。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=143, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Nov 02 16:48:50 CST 2017, time=2017-11-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837145, encodeId=02a783e145c5, content=一轮意见很好，<br> 二轮没有意见被拒。<br> 耽误时间，很是无语，被拒给这么好的一轮意见干嘛。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Sat Jun 24 00:41:21 CST 2017, time=2017-06-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836927, encodeId=e10b83692eb8, content=真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。<br> 这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。<br> 学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=78fc5414021, createdName=ms1549354653385798, createdTime=Mon Jun 12 08:49:31 CST 2017, time=2017-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2017-06-12 ms1549354653385798

    真不知这期刊怎么忽悠进sci收录的，国际sci拒稿都有详细的评审意见。
    这期刊一审还能有详细意见，二审被拒，就直接是“经有关专家审阅及编辑部研究，不予以采用。”没有二审专家的意见，典型的暗箱操作。
    学术打假应对这类期刊好好查查，是怎么评上sci的？他本单位那些文章是怎么录用的？存在多少这种不给意见直接枪毙的。

    0

共14条页码: 1/2页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验，提升MI经验值，获取更多积分